We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
the rationale for not using pysha3 seems that it's not supported by pypy. i checked and this is no longer the case.
pysha3 10x faster than pycryptodome. we should use it by default if it's installed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm good with that. It might take us a bit to get to though, so feel free to open a PR if we're too slow :)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
the rationale for not using pysha3 seems that it's not supported by pypy. i checked and this is no longer the case.
pysha3 10x faster than pycryptodome. we should use it by default if it's installed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: