Update max receipt length constant #40
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks! I'll put the release notes in a PR I'm working on now. |
|
I updated the spec link to target the current commit, so that the spec link doesn't get stale. |
carver
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
carver
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was wrong?
For some reason, we're having trouble decoding ssz-encoded block bodies generated by ultralight. This doesn't seem to solve the problem, but I noticed it was not up-to-date with the spec.
How was it fixed?
Updated constant value & docs.
To-Do
Cute Animal Picture