-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong reward received for Uncles! #1591
Comments
No. The uncle reward formula is So: Here's an example
|
Thank you. Then the announcement was not stated correctly. |
Block number :) |
Sorry, I'm still missing something... my understanding was U_n is a relative order, i. e. the n-th uncle for some block, so the n count resets after a new block is mined and added to the chain. Am I wrong then? |
It's not count. It's number. Uncle number (block number); not inclusion count. |
I see, thank you. Can you please point me to some detailed documentation on how uncles are included? I still can't see how you ensure there are enough uncles so that U_n + 8 - B_n > 0 at any time. |
@federicoon See yellow paper section 11.3 equation 144: gavwood.com/paper.pdf |
Ommer? What the heck does that mean? Is it the same as uncle? |
I not undestand equation 143 . What Bu ? How many for reward ommer ? |
As announced on the forum:
Thus miners who found an Uncle should get 7/8 of 5.0 Ether = 4.375 Ether
In fact we only received 3.75 Ether per Uncle, so we're missing 0.625 Ether per Uncle!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: