Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: in C4, no clear way to divide bigger issues to smaller minimal patch #164

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 2, 2017

Conversation

sorpaas
Copy link
Contributor

@sorpaas sorpaas commented Jun 2, 2017

Solution: point C4 to 20-C4, which implements @dulanov's hierarchical
issues idea.

C4 is good about that each commit should be a minimal identifiable
problem, but does not have any machnisms inside to reach this
goal. 20-C4 tries to be a battery-included modification for C4, which
are being actively tested in this repo (like #122).

sorpaas and others added 2 commits June 3, 2017 03:35
…ches

Solution: point C4 to 20-C4, which implements @dulanov's hierarchical
issues idea.

C4 is good about that each commit should be a minimal identifiable
problem, but does not have any machnisms inside to reach this
goal. 20-C4 tries to be a battery-included modification for C4, which
are being actively tested in this repo (like ETCDEVTeam#122).
@sjmackenzie sjmackenzie merged commit c5113cf into ETCDEVTeam:master Jun 2, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 2, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 76.27% when pulling e833589 on sorpaas:master into ab6af1c on ethereumproject:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 2, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.005%) to 76.265% when pulling e833589 on sorpaas:master into ab6af1c on ethereumproject:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 2, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 76.27% when pulling e833589 on sorpaas:master into ab6af1c on ethereumproject:master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants