Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reupload to network #1051

Closed
Eknir opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Reupload to network #1051

Eknir opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@Eknir
Copy link
Contributor

Eknir commented Dec 15, 2020

Story

  • As a content uploader, I want to be able to instruct my node to re-upload the same content, such that I have another chance of syncing the content if this was not successful before
  • Also a user story to prepare for Reupload pinned chunks #852
  • Re uploading the same chunk twice is also a way how postage stamps can propagate to the nearest-neighborhood

Acceptance criteria

  • Uploading one chunk for two times results in the nearest neighborhood receiving the chunk two times

Background

This issue was created when planning #852. It was mentioned by @acud that merely re uploading to the network is not even possible. It was also mentioned that this issue has the potential of simplifying the design of the local store.

@bee-runner bee-runner bot added the issue label Dec 15, 2020
@Eknir
Copy link
Contributor Author

Eknir commented Dec 18, 2020

@acud , I copied this issue to our backlog, as it is blocking #852. The issue doesn't contain enough information, however. Could you please provide this?

@ldeffenb
Copy link
Collaborator

Bullet one has "change" instead of "chance"?
Bullet three is incomplete: "how postage stamps can..." what?

@Eknir
Copy link
Contributor Author

Eknir commented Jan 18, 2021

Bullet one has "change" instead of "chance"?
Bullet three is incomplete: "how postage stamps can..." what?

Thanks. Adjusted

@significance
Copy link
Member

+1 please 😀

@Eknir
Copy link
Contributor Author

Eknir commented May 21, 2021

Completed per #1705 .

@acud , I would appreciate if we can go over the change you made, so I can see if it fulfills the acceptance criteria

@acud acud closed this as completed Jun 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants