Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Count of fields wrong in import #183

Closed
efg opened this issue Jan 27, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

Count of fields wrong in import #183

efg opened this issue Jan 27, 2012 · 4 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@efg
Copy link
Member

efg commented Jan 27, 2012

When importing participants (or users), it is typical not to specify a password, but rather to have the system generate it. But if you do that, Expertiza reports that each record in the file you are importing does not have enough records. In order to get it to import the file, you need to add " ," to each record.

Expertiza should know that a password is optional, and accept files that have nothing in the password field.

@yangsong8
Copy link
Contributor

When importing students accounts, we can leave the password column blank, but we do need to add an empty column (in plain file, it gonna be ",,").

@yangsong8 yangsong8 reopened this Feb 21, 2017
@yangsong8
Copy link
Contributor

E1656 rejected.

@efg
Copy link
Member Author

efg commented Jun 11, 2018

Was part of E1775, which was not chosen.

@nikolaygtitov
Copy link
Contributor

I used .csv file with two following entries:
xuserstudent | X Student | xstudent@ncsu.edu
yuserstudent | Y Student | ystudent@ncsu.edu

Where '|' is the Tab delimiter. Note that neither entry has password field in it. I used "Tab" as delimiter.
Import was successful and password was auto-generated. Does it need to be tested with plain text instead of .csv file?

Since it did not complaint about missing password field or wrong counts of field with .csv file, the issue can be closed.

@efg efg closed this as completed Aug 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants