Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Licensing #9

Open
olivergs opened this issue Feb 16, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Licensing #9

olivergs opened this issue Feb 16, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@olivergs
Copy link

Hi there

After looking into files I've noticed that there are several files without headers or licenses of any type. This are the files I've found that need licensing information:

process/*
keymaps/*
lib/images/* (except png.js with LGPL)
lib/encrypt.js
lib/sha1.js
lib/prng4.js (http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~tjw/jsbn/LICENSE)
lib/rng.js (http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~tjw/jsbn/LICENSE)

Could you specify what license should I use if I want to redistribute this code?

@JJ
Copy link

JJ commented Feb 16, 2016

Related #3
It would better if they were moved out of the repo.

@aruiz
Copy link

aruiz commented Feb 17, 2016

Yes, the external ones are, but there's a bunch of files that are not clear whether they are external deps or headerless source of the spice client itself. We want clarification before we redistribute anything.

@JJ
Copy link

JJ commented Feb 17, 2016

2016-02-17 12:31 GMT+01:00 Alberto Ruiz notifications@github.com:

Yes, the external ones are, but there's a bunch of files that are not
clear whether they are external deps or headerless source of the spice
client itself. We want clarification before we redistribute anything.

And links to the C source, just in case you need to debug everything :-)

(private joke, just move along)

@Fantu
Copy link
Contributor

Fantu commented Mar 9, 2016

About keymaps/keymapit.js I added the license is the same of the project (agplv3) but without any addition(hoping is right), I'll do a PR with header (at least for the keymap file I added).
I was waiting for a change from the eyeos developers before adding header with same license in the file but no reply for months :(
About the last license post done by developer:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2015-November/023313.html
Some days ago I tried to write also another post about the old and this discussion:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2016-March/027081.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants