-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Did you consider a branch without WireGuard #5
Comments
Is there a particular reason for you not to have WireGuard included in the kernel? Most of the changes in the edge kernel are built as kernel module (WireGuard, IP-VLAN, VXLAN and MAC-VLAN tap driver and CAKE QoS), so you shouldn't be affected (in terms of memory usage or attack surface) if you don't use that functionality. |
I can't dispute that, indeed the only drawback is the fact that it makes it harder to spot the actual differences between the stock kernel and the branch you've created. It would make it more comfortable to adopt. I will be using the built in VPN thus why I'm not interested in it. |
To see the difference between the stock kernel and the edge kernel, see the following file: https://github.com/fabianishere/udm-kernel/blob/master/.github/config/config.edge.udm That contains the options that have been enabled/disabled in the edge kernel. |
Thank you again! |
Hi Fabian, thank you very much for this UDM work. Like so many others I'm really missing the igmpproxy to be able to have IPTV running.
Did you consider having a branch with the kernel with just that difference and without WireGuard?
Thanks in advance for your time!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: