Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Readme command-line options inconsistent #30

Closed
jx2zhou opened this issue Aug 13, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Readme command-line options inconsistent #30

jx2zhou opened this issue Aug 13, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@jx2zhou
Copy link

jx2zhou commented Aug 13, 2014

The readme for this project shows the usage guidelines ...

Usage

brainfuck [-ch] <filenames>
-e  run code directly
-h  show a help message.

... but is unclear as to whether -c or -e is actually the option for running code directly. This could be figured out really quickly by running the program, but I think it'd be beneficial from making the command-line options more unambiguous.

@fabianishere
Copy link
Owner

Ah, my apologies.

Initially, the -c or --code option was used to run brainfuck code via the command line, but we eventually updated it to -e and --eval and I forgot to update that part in the readme.

Thank you for noticing!

fabianishere added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2014
Fix inconsistent command line options in README.md.
@fabianishere fabianishere added Status: Completed bug Something isn't working labels Aug 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants