Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

buck2 init --git may not be producing a correct .gitignore #140

Closed
steveklabnik opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

buck2 init --git may not be producing a correct .gitignore #140

steveklabnik opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

By default, no .gitignore is produced, but I believe that you'd want to produce one for buck-out, because I don't believe (I may be wrong!) that you don't want to include this directory into version control.

@themarwhal
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, that seems like a good default value to put into .gitignore! Thanks for the suggestion.

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/buck2 that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2023
This creates a gitignore that will ignore the default output directory.

Fixes facebook#140
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/buck2 that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2023
This creates a gitignore that will ignore the default output directory.

Fixes facebook#140
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/buck2 that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2023
This creates a gitignore that will ignore the default output directory.

Fixes facebook#140
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2023
Summary:
buck-out should be in .gitignore (if it's empty)

see #140

Reviewed By: stepancheg

Differential Revision: D44882336

fbshipit-source-id: e9d46fedf14f57fcc21513c51c075ba00c20d1b2
@ndmitchell
Copy link
Contributor

Done in 18bcd6f

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants