[act] flush work correctly without a mocked scheduler #16223
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
threepointone
changed the title
|
No significant bundle size changes to report. Generated by 🚫 dangerJS |
threepointone
force-pushed
the
verify-act-unmocked
branch
from
409e435
to
27fa2e0
Compare
gaearon
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2019
Not returning the value of flushPassiveEffects() in flushWork() meant that with async act, we wouldn't flush all work with cascading effects. This PR fixes that oversight, and adds some tests to catch this in the future.
threepointone
force-pushed
the
verify-act-unmocked
branch
from
27fa2e0
to
ea134ae
Compare
NMinhNguyen
referenced
this pull request
in enzymejs/react-shallow-renderer
Jan 29, 2020
Not returning the value of flushPassiveEffects() in flushWork() meant that with async act, we wouldn't flush all work with cascading effects. This PR fixes that oversight, and adds some tests to catch this in the future.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not returning the value of flushPassiveEffects() in flushWork() meant that with async act, we wouldn't flush all work with cascading effects. This PR fixes that oversight, and adds some tests to catch this in the future.