Add model weights license #234
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Adds a copy of the model license to the repo
Renamed the model license to make it clear it refers to the weights
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
|
Agree that it would make this repo's information much clearer! |
|
Closing as Meta has turned this into the LLaMA 2 repo. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Many users are confused about the distinction between "open science" and "open source" and how the license in this repository relates to the terms under which one can use the model itself. To help alleviate some of this confusion, I have added a new file
LICENSE_WEIGHTSwhich contains the licensing information that governs the model weights themselves and noted this distinction in the README.