Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Read the Docs building from master and not latest stable #600

Closed
lwcolton opened this issue Sep 10, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Read the Docs building from master and not latest stable #600

lwcolton opened this issue Sep 10, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@lwcolton
Copy link
Contributor

Falcon Read The Docs default version builds from the master branch of the repo. This means that the defaults docs on RTD and the latest version of falcon available from pypi do no match. My suggestion is to create a "release" branch that is kept at the same commit as the latest release, and use this for our default RTD build branch.

@ueg1990
Copy link
Contributor

ueg1990 commented Sep 13, 2015

How would one do that? I can take a look

@lwcolton
Copy link
Contributor Author

A normal collaborator won't be able too, it will have to be Kurt or someone else with access to RTD.

@kgriffs
Copy link
Member

kgriffs commented Sep 17, 2015

Hmm, something funny is going on. When I browse to https://falcon.readthedocs.org I am redirected to stable (https://falcon.readthedocs.org/en/stable/). At first glance it looks like the correct docs for 0.3, which is the latest tagged version in GH. If I then go to latest (https://falcon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/), I see what looks like the docs from master.

Sounds like you are seeing something different? Or am I missing some subtle difference in the docs?

@kgriffs
Copy link
Member

kgriffs commented Sep 17, 2015

P.S. Right now there are two people with access to RTD (in case I get hit by a bus, heh). I'd love to expand the group of core maintainers/reviewers if others would like to take a more active role.

@kgriffs kgriffs added this to the 1.0 milestone Sep 17, 2015
@kgriffs kgriffs removed this from the 1.0 milestone Feb 17, 2016
@kgriffs
Copy link
Member

kgriffs commented May 19, 2016

This looks OK since the 1.0.0 release. Please reopen if you are seeing something different. Thanks!

@kgriffs kgriffs closed this as completed May 19, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants