You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the feature you would like to implement?
Replace schema inside message body with a type field inside message data. The type should be a 16-bit number.
Why is this feature important?
Right now message type is inferred from the format of the message and the schema field. We should be able to quickly and more directly parse a message and know what set to route it to for merging.
Will the protocol spec need to be updated??
Yes, the protocol spec should include the table of supported message types with each version.
How should this feature be built? (optional)
Here is an initial list of message types:
CastShort
CastRecast
CastRemove
ReactionAdd
ReactionRemove
FollowAdd
FollowRemove
VerificationEthereumAddress
VerificationRemove
SignerAdd
SignerRemove
And here are potential future message types:
Metadata
CastLong
CastPoll
CastEvent
CastRSVP
GroupInviteAdd
GroupInviteGrant
GroupInviteAccept
VerificationBitcoinAddress
VerificationTwitter
VerificationDomain
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is the feature you would like to implement?
Replace
schema
inside message body with atype
field inside message data. Thetype
should be a 16-bit number.Why is this feature important?
Right now message type is inferred from the format of the message and the
schema
field. We should be able to quickly and more directly parse a message and know what set to route it to for merging.Will the protocol spec need to be updated??
Yes, the protocol spec should include the table of supported message types with each version.
How should this feature be built? (optional)
Here is an initial list of message types:
And here are potential future message types:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: