Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Measure code coverage differently #79

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Mar 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

fasterthanlime
Copy link
Collaborator

@fasterthanlime fasterthanlime commented Mar 19, 2024

Before, arguments to trace! weren't ever evaluated. Now they are, which means slower CI runs. But they're not printed, which hopefully means reasonable CI times, still.

@fasterthanlime fasterthanlime enabled auto-merge (squash) March 19, 2024 16:56
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.73%. Comparing base (1ff81a4) to head (f44a7c3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #79      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.50%   79.73%   +4.22%     
==========================================
  Files          25       24       -1     
  Lines        2486     2230     -256     
==========================================
- Hits         1877     1778      -99     
+ Misses        609      452     -157     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fasterthanlime fasterthanlime merged commit 375c4d6 into main Mar 19, 2024
5 checks passed
@fasterthanlime fasterthanlime deleted the trace-test-coverage branch March 19, 2024 17:00
@fasterthanlime fasterthanlime mentioned this pull request Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant