-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use fmw.hasRoute
for fastify.hasRoute
#5092
Comments
fmw.hasRoute
for fastify.hasRoute
fmw.hasRoute
for fastify.hasRoute
If |
I'm ok with both minor and major. IMHO it's more safe to ship a breaking change with a major, especially if it's not a big problem (at least I don't see any issues about that). |
Why this issue is in fast-json-stringify? |
my bad. can you transfer to fastify repo pls? |
In what sense hasRoute does not work? |
|
This landed in the next branch, right? So can we close this issue? |
Prerequisites
Issue
If we do this, this will be a breaking change so it should be done in the next major.
Having that this is a breaking change, it might be also a reasonable solution to keep it as it, but IMHO
fastify.hasRoute
doesn't work correctly/doesn't make much sense in current implementation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: