We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
尊敬的作者:
您好。我发现一个很有提升价值的点。 如果我直接做parsing的finetune, 然后在测试集上看效果, 发现分词的效果很不好, 照理来说不应该这样, 所以我猜测Parsing任务没有包含cws和pos的finetune, 但是照理来说parsing的标签是包含了cws和pos的信息的. 我先执行cws的finetune再执行parsing的finetune发现test集合上的分词效果很好. 所以我理解在执行更高级的任务的时候, 可以先从最低级的任务开始finetune, 而且是自动完成这个过程.
即如果finetune Parsing, 则先finetune cws, 然后finetune pos, 最后finetune parsing
如果finetune pos, 则先finetune cws, 再finetune pos
作者您怎么看?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
这个问题确实存在,当时设计finetune的时候忽略了这一点。我做完当前的投稿之后会改一下这一条
Sorry, something went wrong.
预祝 Best Paper
No branches or pull requests
尊敬的作者:
即如果finetune Parsing, 则先finetune cws, 然后finetune pos, 最后finetune parsing
如果finetune pos, 则先finetune cws, 再finetune pos
作者您怎么看?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: