Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About cycle consistency loss #5

Open
fnzhan opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

About cycle consistency loss #5

fnzhan opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@fnzhan
Copy link

fnzhan commented Aug 11, 2022

Hi @fbxiang , thanks for sharing the codes.
I did some simple experiments, and it seems that removing the cycle loss leads to better novel view synthesis (but maybe more distorted uv map).
In Fig. 3 of the paper, removing cycle loss will lead to very bad mapping results which didn't happen in my experiments. May I know how to get the results in the last column of Fig. 3? Thanks.

@fbxiang
Copy link
Owner

fbxiang commented Aug 21, 2022

Removing the cycle loss means putting no restriction in the UV map, so it may or may not produce distorted UV maps. Different seed/initialization will result in different UV maps, and figure 3 just shows what I got after removing the cycle loss. I do not remember doing anything special, but since this UV map can be quite random, maybe doing the experiments using different random seeds/initializations would reproduce a more distorted map.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants