You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @fbxiang , thanks for sharing the codes.
I did some simple experiments, and it seems that removing the cycle loss leads to better novel view synthesis (but maybe more distorted uv map).
In Fig. 3 of the paper, removing cycle loss will lead to very bad mapping results which didn't happen in my experiments. May I know how to get the results in the last column of Fig. 3? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Removing the cycle loss means putting no restriction in the UV map, so it may or may not produce distorted UV maps. Different seed/initialization will result in different UV maps, and figure 3 just shows what I got after removing the cycle loss. I do not remember doing anything special, but since this UV map can be quite random, maybe doing the experiments using different random seeds/initializations would reproduce a more distorted map.
Hi @fbxiang , thanks for sharing the codes.
I did some simple experiments, and it seems that removing the cycle loss leads to better novel view synthesis (but maybe more distorted uv map).
In Fig. 3 of the paper, removing cycle loss will lead to very bad mapping results which didn't happen in my experiments. May I know how to get the results in the last column of Fig. 3? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: