Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No pose supervision? #7

Open
AbyssGaze opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

No pose supervision? #7

AbyssGaze opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@AbyssGaze
Copy link

After looking at the code, it seems that I didn't see any estimation or supervision of pose during the training process. Additionally, the "Iterative" mentioned in the paper seems to correspond to the number of iterations for self-cross attention. I'm not sure if I misunderstood this.

@feixue94
Copy link
Owner

The code of pose supervision is very similar to that used in OANet and will be added later. In each iteration, we perform descriptor augmentation (self/cross) and pose estimation, so it is more like how many steps needed to augment the descriptors so as to find good matches. More iterations are used for tough cases and fewer for easy ones.

@AbyssGaze
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your reply. I have tried to add OANet directly to the matching for pose estimation before, but the performance slightly decreased. I'm looking forward to your pose estimation code. Thank you very much.

@July0928
Copy link

July0928 commented Dec 25, 2023

Hi, i try the pose supervision on the superglue by learnable coefficient, but the result is not good. I want to confirm if the loss function formed between the generated R、t and groundtruth is through L2Loss? Would you release the code for constructing the loss function section, if possible?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants