Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
504 lines (269 loc) · 19.1 KB

2019_01_pauPHD_OA_diapos_SSH.md

File metadata and controls

504 lines (269 loc) · 19.1 KB

Open access and beyond : means, opportunities and challenges

ED481 - École doctorale des Sciences Sociales et Humanités de l’université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour

30th January 2019

Training material available here

Frédérique Flamerie open access and data librarian University of Bordeaux - Documentation department

licence_cc 50%


Agenda

Movies and TV Game

justeprix 80% hal_2001

Discussions : ❓Q01 ❓Q02


Agenda

DataGueule « Privés de savoir? » and addenda

Open access avatars

Specificities for humanities and social sciences

What opportunities for you ?

The big picture


DataGueule « Privés de savoir? »

datagueule 75% Available at : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnxqoP-c0ZE


"Privés de savoir? " - addendum 1 : French Law

The Law for a Digital Republic promulgated on 8 October 2016 includes an article dedicated to open access to scientific articles, article 30.

image_loi 40%


"Privés de savoir? " - addendum 1 : French Law

In short, all scientific articles resulting from public research can now be deposited into an open access repository :

  • in a manuscript format : author accepted manuscript (AAM),
  • with a maximum embargo of 6 months (science and medicine)/12 months (humanities and social sciences),

regardless of the publisher's open access policy.

Do you want to know more?


"Privés de savoir? " - addendum 2 : versions of an article

Version of Record (VoR) : https://doi.org/10.25428/1824-2979/201802-231-2482 / AAM : http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01736525 ⚠️ same journal but different articles vor_shs 70% aam_shs 70%


"Privés de savoir? " - addendum 2 : versions of an article

Definition of AAM :

Paper as accepted for publication, including all changes resulting from peer review, but not necessarily incorporating the publisher’s formatting or layout.

From : Oxford University. ‘Glossary’. open access oxford. Retrieved from http://openaccess.ox.ac.uk/glossary/

It is different from the proofs.

➡️ How to get this version of your article from publishers' submission systems?

Open Access Button. (2018). ‘Direct2AAM: Helping Authors Find Author Accepted Manuscripts’. Open Access Button. Retrieved from https://openaccessbutton.org/direct2aam


"Privés de savoir? " - addendum 2 : versions of an article

versions_article


"Privés de savoir? " - addendum 3 : who needs access to scientific publications?

❓Q03

Tennant, J. P. et al. (2016). ‘The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review’. F1000Research, 5, 632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3

A dedicated website : http://whoneedsaccess.org

This site is run collaboratively by the @access working group — a loose coalition of academics in various fields — plus you. We want to know your stories about how access to scientific literature has enabled you to do more, create more, and give more back to the world. If that’s you, please see the Contribute page.


"Privés de savoir? " - addendum 3 : what does access means?

By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

Chan, L. et al. (2002). ‘Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative’. Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read


Open access avatars logo open access 20%


Open access avatars : is this open access 1/3? ❓Q04

oa_oup_ssh_01 80% ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ oa_oup_ssh_02 90%


Open access avatars : is this open access 2/3? ❓Q05

oa_wiley 90%


Open access avatars : is this open access 3/3?

promo springer


Open access avatars

OA 2 blocs


Open access avatars

OA 2 blocs fragm 90%


The green and the grey

We will go into more details regarding these services later on, for the moment let's just check the following chart.

repositories_social_networks 92%


The gold and the grey

oa gold 90%

❓Q06


The gold and the grey : economic typology

oa gold_prices


The gold and the grey : economic typology

Data from Open APC : 2005-2018, 158 research institutions

Value in € Full OA Hybrid OA
average 1481 2490
median 1407 2443

There is hence concern that hybrid APCs often reflect traditional publishers’ concern to maintain existing profit margins and market position rather than the true costs of publishing.

Ross-Hellauer, T. et al. (2018). ‘Are funder Open Access platforms a good idea?’ PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26954v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26954v1


The gold and the grey : specificity for humanities and social sciences

The hybrid model (the grey) is more proeminent in exact sciences, technology and medicine ; if you want to know more about this model, please check the ED211 session's slides. :warning: Data from Web of Science - mind the gap! (see next slide)

journals_oa_disciplines 85%


Counting open access journals : mind the gap!

Social Sciences : 21,2% of open access journals indexed in Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ, see below) are included in Web of Science

Arts & Humanities : 19,5%

From : 101 Innovations. (2018). ‘Towards a Plan S gap analysis? (2) Gold open access journals in WoS and DOAJ’. Innovations in Scholarly Communication. Retrieved from https://101innovations.wordpress.com/2018/12/05/gold-oa-journals-in-wos-and-doaj/


The gold and the grey : specificity for arts and humanities

⚠️ Data from Web of Science

journals_ah


The gold and the grey : specificity for social sciences

⚠️ Data from Web of Science

journals_soc


The gold : specificity for humanities and social sciences

In contrast with journals in exact sciences, technology and medicine, most open acess journals in social sciences and humanities do not charge fees (article processing charges). The economic model of those journals may be based on one or more of the following elements.


The gold : how to find your way around?

Helps you identify trusted journals, using among others DOAJ

The Directory of Open Access Journals is an independant, community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

Quality Open Access Market is developed ad maintained by researchers from Radboud University Nijmegen, QUOAM is a market place, including quality scoring based on academic crowd sourcing and price information with institutional licensed pricing.


Towards non-profit scholarly communication ?

Adema, J. & Stone, G. (2017). ‘Taking back control: the new university and academic presses that are re-envisioning scholarly publishing’. LSE Impact Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/09/20/taking-back-control-the-new-university-and-academic-presses-that-are-re-envisioning-scholarly-publishing/

Pooley, J. (2017). ‘Scholarly communications shouldn’t just be open, but non-profit too’. LSE Impact Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/08/15/scholarly-communications-shouldnt-just-be-open-but-non-profit-too/

logo foaa 50%


Specificity for humanities and social sciences : what about books? economics

OpenEdition publishes not only journals but also books.

Open Edition Freemium programme includes books - univ. Pau is one of the subscribing institutions.

Crowdfunding programme to "unlatch", make open access, journals and monographs.


Specificity for humanities and social sciences : what about books? editorial concerns

logodoab

DOAB indexes academic books provided they are :

  • available under an Open Access license (such as a Creative Commons license),
  • subjected to independent and external peer review prior to publication.

More about books : Mounier, P. (2019). ‘Open Scholarly monographs, from technology to usage’. Presented at the FOSTER - DARIAH workshop Open Access in the Humanities, Berlin. Retrieved from https://fr.slideshare.net/piotrr/open-scholarly-monographs-from-technology-to-usage


What opportunities for you?

image_go


You are using publications : broaden your scope

In terms of disciplinary coverage In terms of types of document retrievable

❓ Q07

❓ Q08


You are using publications : tools to find journal articles : Google Scholar

Search interface :heavy_plus_sign: Browser extension :heavy_plus_sign: Source for the browser extension Lazy Scholar

More about Google Scholar invention here : Levy, S. (2014). ‘The Gentleman Who Made Scholar’. Backchannel. Retrieved from https://medium.com/backchannel/the-gentleman-who-made-scholar-d71289d9a82d -


You are using publications : tools to find journal articles : other tools

Browser extension :heavy_plus_sign: integrated into Zotero, Scopus, Web of Science, etc.

Browser extension : search and request, articles :heavy_plus_sign: might be integrated into library services

More about Unpaywall and Open Access Button

See the page https://openaccessbutton.org/skip_the_paywall


You are using publications : tools to find other open access materials 1/2

logo_base BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine

  • Non commercial
  • Defined sources
  • Advanced search : including/excluding document types
  • Sorting and filtering results

You are using publications : tools to find other open access materials 2/2

logo_isidore Isidore - "Votre assistant de recherche en Sciences Humaines et Sociales"

  • Non commercial : part of Huma-Num
  • Disciplinary specialization
  • Defined sources
  • Metadata enhancements
  • Advanced search, etc. :heavy_plus_sign: integrated into Zotero

You are producing publications : publishing preprints?

A definition :

In short, a preprint is a research output that has not completed a typical publication pipeline but is of value to the community and deserving of being easily discovered and accessed.

and a how-to : Bourne, P. E. et al. (2017). ‘Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission’. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473


You are producing publications : publishing preprints?

Does this way of publishing apply to humanities and social sciences (beyond economy that has long adopted it)?

In the short run, SocArXiv will be a convenient, fast, free, open paper server. In the longer run, we hope it will be a building block for the future system of scholarly communication. In sociology, the discipline with which I (and our steering committee) are most familiar, we do not have a strong cultural norm of pre-print paper sharing, or data sharing. But sociologists – like most social scientists – do want our research to have an impact in the wider world, to reach a broader audience, and to engage with the public for the benefit of all parties. Our challenge is to persuade these academic communities that open scholarship is necessary for achieving that larger ambition.

Cohen, P. (2016). ‘Developing SocArXiv — a new open archive of the social sciences to challenge the outdated journal system.’ LSE Impact Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/07/11/developing-socarxiv-an-open-archive-of-the-social-sciences/


You are producing publications : publishing preprints?

A story

Marwick, B. (2019). ‘We put a pre-print on @socarxiv 10 days ago. Yesterday I got a request from a journal to peer review a paper. Our pre-print is cited in the paper I’m reviewing. Pre-prints are a truly impressive accelerator of research communication. cf. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511912112 … #academictwitterpic.twitter.com/NvPYvSHrXN’ [Tweet]. @benmarwick. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/benmarwick/status/1085226457217982465

Do you know other preprint platforms than SocArXiv?

PhilArchive? PsyArXiv?


You are producing research : "open access made concrete"

  • You can show how your research evolves over time (with everything being online, you are held accountable if you change your  mind, say things differently, etc.)
  • You can address different communities depending on what part of your research you decide to make available
  • You have tools to speak about your data/corpora in further publications

First level items, see slides 8 and 9 for details

Naomi, T. (2019). ‘How to make the most of your publications in the humanities?’ Presented at the FOSTER - DARIAH workshop Open Access in the Humanities, Berlin. Retrieved from https://f.hypotheses.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/3903/files/2019/01/Open-Access-Berlin-Naomi-Truan-21.01.2019.pdf


You are producing publications : enhancing your visibility as a researcher

ORCID + other tools (after the break)

  • Building your reputation
    • be visible as a researcher
    • be identified in a unique and unambiguous way
  • Giving full text access to ALL your productions and outputs (articles, data, thesis, etc.)

orcid_logo 70%


The big picture


Open access is one facet of open science

open science


Stakeholders' policies

Are you aware of funders' expectations and requirements ?

  • European Commission

Dechamp, J.-F. (2018). ‘Research and Innovation in transformation: the transition to Open Science’. Presented at the NARMA2018, Lillestrom. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/OpenAccessEC/research-and-innovation-in-transformation-the-transition-to-open-science

  • cOAlition S - including ANR

Science Europe. (2018). ‘Plan S : Making full and immediate Open Access a reality’. Retrieved from https://www.scienceeurope.org/coalition-s/


Thank you for your attention!

Des ⁉️

Des 💡


📧 frederique.flamerie-de-lachapelle@u-bordeaux.fr 📞 05.40.00.89.91


orcid_logo 30% orcid.org/0000-0001-6014-0134