Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature request: tiled area #45

Closed
sevenoffline opened this issue Mar 24, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #59
Closed

feature request: tiled area #45

sevenoffline opened this issue Mar 24, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #59
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sevenoffline
Copy link

How about offering the possibility to cut the selected (square) area into (square) tiles - 3x3 & 4x4 should be sufficient.
With this feature it would be possible to print a larger area in pieces that can be glued together.

@fgebhart fgebhart added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 25, 2022
@fgebhart
Copy link
Owner

Sounds like a good idea and I will investigate what it would need for this to be implemented.

Maybe this does not even need to be restricted to square shapes and could also be applied to rectangles in general. I'm thinking of an approach which would work for both.

@sevenoffline
Copy link
Author

Maybe my imagination was too arty by limiting that feature to squares :D You're right, a general approach is much more functional.

@fgebhart
Copy link
Owner

Just rolled out the tiling feature! Would love to hear what you think 🙂

Give it a try, as usually here: https://share.streamlit.io/fgebhart/mapa-streamlit/main/app.py

Also note, that STL files are now zipped as default. As mentioned already elsewhere, this reduces data volume transferred via the network by a factor of three to four. However, it also requires more time to compress the STL file(s), but I also included the zipping into the progress bar to make things transparent.

All STL files within one zip file are of equal data quality / resolution. I will try to see if it would make sense to also make the resolution limit configurable going forward (as requested in #60).

@sevenoffline
Copy link
Author

Works 99% great! The edges do not line up perfectly but I guess this is within tolerance. Look: https://imgur.com/anDsIwl

@sevenoffline
Copy link
Author

Another thing: the Z-height-scale is different - the 1x1 is taller than the 3x3. Look: https://imgur.com/a/uifba3b

@fgebhart
Copy link
Owner

Many thanks for having a detailed look. Will try to investigate this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants