Should Fp6 be part of the public API?

[dot-asm]

What prevents you from omitting fp6.rs?

[dignifiedquire]

Good question, I mostly added it to match the previous implementation as close as possible, but now that I am looking at the usage, nothing seems to ever use Fp6 outside of the internals.

[dot-asm]

nothing seems to ever use Fp6 outside of the internals

Right. The fp6 is just a detail of fp12 implementation. And actually so are fp and fp2. It's just that fp and fp2 are used even in point arithmetic...

[dot-asm]

The fp6 is just a detail of fp12 implementation. And actually so are fp and fp2. It's just that fp and fp2 are used even in point arithmetic...

Meaning that if point interface is sufficient for application purposes (or can be complemented to be sufficient), one can as well omit fp and fp2.

[dignifiedquire]

I will leave it for the moment, might revisit later.