Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Impliment boostd config default Command in the Same Manner as Lotus #1488

Closed
4 of 9 tasks
TippyFlitsUK opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1489
Closed
4 of 9 tasks

Impliment boostd config default Command in the Same Manner as Lotus #1488

TippyFlitsUK opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1489
Labels

Comments

@TippyFlitsUK
Copy link

Checklist

  • This is not a new feature or an enhancement to the Filecoin protocol. If it is, please open an FIP issue.
  • This is not brainstorming ideas. If you have an idea you'd like to discuss, please open a new discussion on the Boost forum and select the category as Ideas.
  • I have a specific, actionable, and well motivated feature request to propose.

Boost component

  • boost daemon - storage providers
  • boost client
  • boost UI
  • boost data-transfer
  • boost index-provider
  • Other

What is the motivation behind this feature request? Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Additional SP tooling to assist with configuration options.

Describe the solution you'd like

Lotus users currently have the option to run lotus config default and lotus-miner config default to display the default configuration options in the CLI for both daemon and miner instances.

This has proven to be a very useful feature to SPs for a number of reasons such as quickly being able to examine updated config options following new releases.

The Lotus Team frequently;y refers to this command in weekly Lotus updates/newsletters and it would be great to include the same functionality in Boost.

Many thanks 🙏

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant