Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Creating An OSPO #119

Merged
merged 41 commits into from
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Creating An OSPO #119

merged 41 commits into from
Aug 31, 2023

Conversation

robmoffat
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@robmoffat robmoffat changed the title CreatingAnOSPO Creating An OSPO Mar 23, 2023
@robmoffat
Copy link
Member Author

robmoffat commented Mar 24, 2023

@pcheong-lbg we should make sure we link to some definitions of the term OSPO from the TODOGroup (maybe quote them too). Also, sometimes it's called other things (https://osr.finos.org/docs/bok/OSMM/Level-2)

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Apr 3, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@robmoffat robmoffat mentioned this pull request Apr 18, 2023
Added links as per issue #87
@robmoffat
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @pcheong-lbg,

Did you have a chance to check @TheJuanAndOnly99 's link above?

thanks,
Rob

@robmoffat robmoffat marked this pull request as ready for review July 3, 2023 14:53
@robmoffat
Copy link
Member Author

Hey @pcheong-lbg ,

Are you ready to get this reviewed? It would be nice to have it in the body of knowledge as there are a few bits of work coming through that build on top of this.

(nb, it doesn't stop you or @aronya-roy-lbg raising a further PR for anything else you want to add)

cheers,
Rob

@robmoffat robmoffat requested a review from anajsana July 17, 2023 09:08
@robmoffat
Copy link
Member Author

@psmulovics
Copy link
Contributor

psmulovics commented Aug 2, 2023

  • where should an OSPO live - companies might not want it to be rooted in CISO/security, rather under CTO. "You do not want your OSPO to be associated with security issues" - @BrittanyIstenes
  • creating an ospo - urgency - level or representation is important as a competitive item, e.g. other fintech is already having an OSPO and operating on a higher level

@robmoffat
Copy link
Member Author

@vickiychung added your content into this:

https://deploy-preview-119--open-source-readiness.netlify.app/docs/bok/Activities/Level-3/Culture

Also expanded greatly on the metrics, breaking into different categories:

https://deploy-preview-119--open-source-readiness.netlify.app/docs/bok/Measurements/Introduction

@aronya-roy-lbg would love to know if you have anything to add?

But otherwise this feels good enough to publish for me.

@robmoffat robmoffat requested review from a team, anajsana and psmulovics and removed request for anajsana August 11, 2023 12:02
@psmulovics
Copy link
Contributor

  • where should an OSPO live - companies might not want it to be rooted in CISO/security, rather under CTO. "You do not want your OSPO to be associated with security issues" - @BrittanyIstenes
  • creating an ospo - urgency - level or representation is important as a competitive item, e.g. other fintech is already having an OSPO and operating on a higher level

Were these two items taken into consideration now, @robmoffat ? If they are, I haven't found them yet :D

@robmoffat
Copy link
Member Author

robmoffat commented Aug 11, 2023

no sorry, I've not addressed those yet :(. sorry

@robmoffat
Copy link
Member Author

addressed now

@robmoffat
Copy link
Member Author

@psmulovics can you take a look and see if you're happy with the changes here?

@psmulovics
Copy link
Contributor

@psmulovics can you take a look and see if you're happy with the changes here?

Perfectly, thank you!

@robmoffat robmoffat merged commit 9de5909 into main Aug 31, 2023
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants