Principle: Contributions should generate interest within the member organisation #16
ColinEberhardt
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Am not sure if this is substantially different from #15 - could also argue that "general interest" is a lesser requirement than "adoption" - e.g. Alice have a general interest in her competitor Bob doing exploratory work in an area so she doesn't have to, but she may not adopt Bob's work even if it is a success as she may have her own internal implementation. I know this isn't really in the spirt of Open Source but it's probably still the reality in a lot of places. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
How do we define "generate interest" (if we keep this one) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Why? FINOS wishes to drive both adoption of, and collaboration within their portfolio of projects and standards. A key prerequisite of this is ‘general interest’. Ideally this interest should be expressed at the point of contribution, however, we may accept projects that we feel have the potential to generate interest among the members in the future.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions