We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
for a scenario where we have different avp agreements (Dictionary having different response/answer) for Voice ccr/a , Data ccr/a , Event ccr/a.
1)found that currently code base does not validate the answer
iam planning to enhance the parser to hold commands for different request type and then use them to validate response/answer
any one faced such a scenario ..any other approach used ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's nothing in the code to specifically validate any of these answers. Basically you write your own handlers.
Perhaps I'm missing something here but the general rule is that request/response handlers are out of the scope of the library code.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
for a scenario where we have different avp agreements (Dictionary having different response/answer) for
Voice ccr/a , Data ccr/a , Event ccr/a.
1)found that currently code base does not validate the answer
iam planning to enhance the parser to hold commands for different request type and then use them to validate response/answer
any one faced such a scenario ..any other approach used ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: