Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

QUIC spam protection vs INITIAL packet spam #1947

Open
nbridge-jump opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

QUIC spam protection vs INITIAL packet spam #1947

nbridge-jump opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Priority: Medium quic RFC 9000: QUIC
Milestone
Frankendancer

Comments

@nbridge-jump
Copy link
Contributor

INITIAL packets have to be decrypted before they can be processed. So we need to rate limit them to avoid DoS issues.

May need a tester regardless, to verify the rate limit is effective.
@nbridge-jump nbridge-jump added this to the Frankendancer milestone May 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Priority: Medium quic RFC 9000: QUIC
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Frankendancer
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nbridge-jump