You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
you wrote in the cpu.txt that on hyperthreading systems it is better to assign threads to physical cores, but I have a dual XEON wiht 10 physical cores each for a total of 40 logical cores and the autoconfiguratior gave me this:
You have 10 physical cores and 25MB of L3 cache. So the auto suggestion algorithm assigned 13 (26MB) cores per physical package. I think this is a fairly optimal setup. You can try removing the 6 extra cores and promoting 6 other ones to low_power_mode
One more thing, how can I suppress the output?
I set the output file in config.txt but I still get the terminal output.
Moreover, when I send the program to background it stop.
Hi,
you wrote in the cpu.txt that on hyperthreading systems it is better to assign threads to physical cores, but I have a dual XEON wiht 10 physical cores each for a total of 40 logical cores and the autoconfiguratior gave me this:
So the miner is using 26 logical cores, 20 physical cores + 6 HTT cores.
Can you explain me this discrepancy?
I think the HTT core IDs are: 20,21,22,30,31,32, am I right?
So I can test which configuration is better.
This is my hwloc-ls:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: