Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Expose addition test arguments on flame test #2832

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 31, 2023

Conversation

erickzanardo
Copy link
Member

@erickzanardo erickzanardo commented Oct 31, 2023

Description

There were a few arguments in test that wasn't being exposed by testWithGame and testWithFlameGame.

Checklist

  • I have followed the Contributor Guide when preparing my PR.
  • I have updated/added tests for ALL new/updated/fixed functionality.
  • I have updated/added relevant documentation in docs and added dartdoc comments with ///.
  • I have updated/added relevant examples in examples or docs.

Breaking Change?

  • Yes, this PR is a breaking change.
  • No, this PR is not a breaking change.

Related Issues

Replace or remove this text.

@erickzanardo erickzanardo requested a review from a team October 31, 2023 15:07
@erickzanardo erickzanardo changed the title feat: expose addition test arguments on flame test feat: Expose addition test arguments on flame test Oct 31, 2023
Copy link
Member

@luanpotter luanpotter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment on lines +31 to +32
dynamic tags,
dynamic skip,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
dynamic tags,
dynamic skip,
Object? tags,
Object? skip,

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we match the api from test?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They just have it as dynamic for legacy reasons, but we could, doesn't matter that much.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

got ya, I slightly feel we would rather keep matching their apis. Gonna go with as is right now.

@erickzanardo erickzanardo merged commit 08b4bd6 into main Oct 31, 2023
8 of 11 checks passed
@erickzanardo erickzanardo deleted the feat/expose-addition-test-arguments branch October 31, 2023 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants