-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NP Wilson Coefficients in Various EFTs #136
Comments
Hi Matthew, no it's not possible to construct a FastLikelihood in two separate EFTs and it would be inconsistent to do something like this. The WET Wilson coefficients encode some of the same new physics effects as the SMEFT Wilson coefficients. Contributions to WET Wilson coefficients are generated from SMEFT Wilson coefficients by matching the two EFTs at the electroweak scale. |
Hi, Peter, That all makes a lot of sense, and Thanks! |
Looks like we need to advertise smelli more strongly on the flavio website 😉 |
That's a very good point! I think at the moment smelli is not mentioned at all on the flavio website. |
I think this issue can be closed. |
Hi,
I have been working on a project where so far we have two separate fits in flavio: one using the WET for flavour observables and another using SMEFT for Higgs signal strengths. So far we have not seen a way to combine the two sets of observables into a single fit due to the two different EFTs being used for the different Wilson coefficients.
Is it possible in flavio to introduce Wilson coefficients in two separate EFTs like this into one FastLikelihood fit?
Thanks, Matthew
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: