Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recursive file indexing in the "Archive" tab #284

Open
jkctech opened this issue Jul 20, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Recursive file indexing in the "Archive" tab #284

jkctech opened this issue Jul 20, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jkctech
Copy link

jkctech commented Jul 20, 2022

In the archive tab in the app, there is no way to list files that are sorted in folders, only files directly in the subfolders are listed.

Describe the solution you'd like
A folder like "browser" or all files indexed recursively and listed as a single list would be handy to have.

@LionZXY LionZXY added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 1, 2022
@LionZXY LionZXY mentioned this issue Aug 7, 2022
@Foul
Copy link

Foul commented Aug 8, 2022

And I'll add : listed alphabetically if possible.

@LionZXY
Copy link
Member

LionZXY commented Aug 8, 2022

And I'll add : listed alphabetically if possible.

Then the order of the keys will be different on Flipper and on Android.

@evaneaston
Copy link

@jkctech do you mean allow viewing irs and subs that
are in folders below the /ext/infrared and /ext/subghz? If so, I completely agree. Otherwise we have to resort to longer file names to categorize by device. And then the names are to long to show in a widget or favorite on the flipper.

@Not-swasd
Copy link

is there any update?

@jdrch
Copy link

jdrch commented Jul 6, 2024

And I'll add : listed alphabetically if possible.

Then the order of the keys will be different on Flipper and on Android.

Perhaps, but for those of us with many keys the status quo makes finding them time consuming. This in turns reduces the Flipper Zero's usefulness as the delay makes it quicker to just use the original 1st party key.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants