Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Digest Authentication Scheme? #289

Closed
Marenz opened this issue May 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Digest Authentication Scheme? #289

Marenz opened this issue May 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Projects

Comments

@Marenz
Copy link

Marenz commented May 11, 2019

My server allows only the digest authentication. Apparently that's not supported in the extension, the server logs say "Client used wrong authentication scheme "basic"".

Or maybe it is and I have to enable it somehow?

@marcelklehr marcelklehr added this to Backlog in Floccus May 11, 2019
@marcelklehr
Copy link
Member

marcelklehr commented May 12, 2019

Currently, only basic auth is supported with WebDAV sync, I might get around to implemting Digest auth in the future.

@marcelklehr marcelklehr moved this from Backlog to To Do in Floccus May 16, 2019
@clash82
Copy link

clash82 commented May 22, 2019

I would also love to see this implemented.

@marcelklehr marcelklehr added this to the 3.4.0 milestone Jun 13, 2019
@marcelklehr marcelklehr removed this from the 3.4.0 milestone Jul 27, 2019
@marcelklehr
Copy link
Member

Closing this as it's my opinion digest auth gives a false sense of security. If you want secure auth, use basic auth + ssl.

Floccus automation moved this from To Do to Done Aug 13, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants