Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not supported block of terracta (hardened clay) ? #1

Closed
foxdog05000 opened this issue Feb 3, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Not supported block of terracta (hardened clay) ? #1

foxdog05000 opened this issue Feb 3, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@foxdog05000
Copy link

foxdog05000 commented Feb 3, 2018

Hello, I love your app !

I performed several tests with different structures and blocks on Minecraft 1.12. The result is really great!
But I noticed that not all blocks are supported at the moment ? Like terracota (hardened clay) for example.

On the other hand with wool everything works well !

I created a schematic of this iron golem.

2018-02-03_12 05 25

Link to shematic : https://drive.google.com/open?id=15ymlycr5MUmtETCDi2f2mUTHU3hmNzyu

And I didn't get the expected result when I used your app. Hey, what's going on ?
image

@FlorianFe
Copy link
Owner

Hello foxdog05000,

thanks for letting me know about this issue. It seems like all the blocks with an ID of above 127 (like the Terracotta Block with 159) will be interpreted as Air, so you just can see the parts of the iron golem which have an ID smaller than 128, which is just the stone block. I guess the problem is because I interpret an "unsigned char" as a normal "char" somewhere.

Whatever it is I will fix it in the next version :)

@foxdog05000
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your time and explanations. I'll wait until the problem is fixed !

FlorianFe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2018
@FlorianFe
Copy link
Owner

The problem should be fixed in the new version 1.1.3 Beta now =)

image

@foxdog05000
Copy link
Author

Hi, I'm reopening this issue to show you the finished construction!! I spent a lot of time putting all this together but the result is great ! Thanks !

sam_1063

@FlorianFe
Copy link
Owner

Awesome!!! :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants