Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dvorak-ES layout request #1853

Closed
SrEstegosaurio opened this issue May 15, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1884
Closed

Dvorak-ES layout request #1853

SrEstegosaurio opened this issue May 15, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1884
Labels
area: kbd-layout Keyboard layout requests / issues / improvements proposal A proposal for a new feature or an enhancement

Comments

@SrEstegosaurio
Copy link

Hello,
If possible it would be very nice to add a Dvorak-es layout to florisboard.

Something similar to this one:
Screenshot_20220515-100440~2.png

Thanks for such a nice app!

@SrEstegosaurio SrEstegosaurio added the proposal A proposal for a new feature or an enhancement label May 15, 2022
@SrEstegosaurio
Copy link
Author

I forgot to add the kbd-layout flag and I can't figure out how to do it from my phone. Sorry about that.

@tsiflimagas tsiflimagas added the area: kbd-layout Keyboard layout requests / issues / improvements label May 15, 2022
@tsiflimagas
Copy link
Collaborator

Don't worry about it, those further tags can only be put by users with certain permissions to the repo.

@tsiflimagas
Copy link
Collaborator

Which keyboard has this layout? Every keyboard I tried has a slightly different Dvorak-es layout.

@tsiflimagas
Copy link
Collaborator

Uh, sorry, I just saw there's a Dvorak (ÑÇ) layout.

@tsiflimagas
Copy link
Collaborator

I added this layout in #1884. You can try the debug build if you want to see if the layout is correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: kbd-layout Keyboard layout requests / issues / improvements proposal A proposal for a new feature or an enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants