-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ARM file for Raspberry Pi 4 #7
Comments
I'm facing the same issue. I am running a 64-bit kernel on Raspberry OS 10 and the output of my Not sure why docker is trying to pull the arm image for Any suggestions? |
I am not sure what docker uses to determine the architecture but I was able to pull the image by making two modifications in my docker-compose file I used the Hope this helps anyone facing the same issue. |
The output of |
You're right @mu88, the armv7l signifies that it is a 32 bit architecture. If you want to use joplin, you'll need a 64-bit kernel. The migration is pretty straightforward and doesn't mess up with your existing installation much (at least for me it didn't), you probably will need to install 64bit versions of some libraries, but that should be it. |
Thank you @abhilesh! I will think about upgrading to Raspbian x64, but honestly I don't feel so comfortable with using a beta OS 😉 And could you please share your modified |
So, ends up that joplin server requires an entire 64-bit OS and not just the 64-bit kernel. While I was able to pull the image and start the container, since the image wasn't built for a 32-bit OS, the joplin server wouldn't start. The alternative for me was to flash a 64-bit OS and start from scratch when I came across this amazing post - https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1621085#p1621085 Sakaki managed to build a containerized 64-bit shell for the RPi4 and now the 'raspbian-nspawn-64' package is installable from the official Raspbian repo making installation a breeze. My understanding of this method is that it creates a hybrid mode with the 64-bit image (debian-buster) running within a container on top of the base 32-bit Raspbian OS. All network interfaces are available within the 64-bit container, so it's almost like running processes natively on a 64-bit OS. I was able to set this up on my RPi, as I already had a 64 bit kernel and didn't want to start from scratch. I was able to get the latest joplin server up and running inside the 64-bit container and have set up syncs successfully. It's very stable so far. PS: I used the default docker-compose.yml from https://hub.docker.com/r/florider89/joplin-server with the |
@abhilesh Could you please describe what you mean by an entire 64-bit OS and not just the 64-bit kernel? Because on this page I get the impression that Raspberry Pi OS is a complete x64 OS and not just the Kernel 🤔 |
@mu88, I started out on the 32-bit Raspberry Pi OS (32-bit kernel and 32-bit userland) and mostly used docker to deploy web services. Most of the web services I used ran without any issues but then, I started coming across services like PhotoPrism that needed at least a 64-bit kernel on the Pi. This is possible by just upgrading the Pi kernel using This above step gave me a hybrid environment (32-bit OS with 32-bit userland and 64-bit kernel). I then found out that for other apps like Joplin, this hybridization is not enough. At this point, I had already invested a bunch into getting the other services running and did not want to do a complete wipe to accommodate Joplin, at which point I came across the If you were to start afresh, you could simply flash your Pi with a 64-bit OS (the resource you outlined works perfectly for this). You can then use flosoft's docker image to install Joplin Server on your Raspberry Pi. Hope this helps. |
Hi 👋🏻
Thank you for your effort providing an ARM-based Joplin Docker image. When trying to pull
florider89/joplin-server:latest
on my Raspberry Pi 4, it fails withno matching manifest for linux/arm/v7 in the manifest list entries
.Could you also provide a Docker image for that platform?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: