Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Compare with bubblewrap / unshare #2

Closed
pwFoo opened this issue Dec 29, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Compare with bubblewrap / unshare #2

pwFoo opened this issue Dec 29, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@pwFoo
Copy link

pwFoo commented Dec 29, 2020

Hi,
I played the last days with unshare and bubblewrap / bwrap.

Use all possible namespaces, mount files / directories and a way to get a network namespace working inside of the container would be nice...

Bwrap lacks netwoking an optional config file instead of just cli arguments.
@pwFoo
Copy link
Author

pwFoo commented Dec 29, 2020

Bwrap supports tmpfs, mount-proc and more nice features.

@flouthoc
Copy link
Owner

@pwFoo Hi sorry for late reply. As compared to bubblewrap this is very minimal. Hopefully we can implement few more features to make it comparable.

@flouthoc
Copy link
Owner

flouthoc commented May 8, 2021

@pwFoo I am closing this issue. Would reopen this if there are any more doubts.

@flouthoc flouthoc closed this as completed May 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pwFoo @flouthoc