You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm relatively new to flow-typed so I apologize if this functionality already exists and I just haven't been able to find it, although my initial playing around with it doesn't seem to indicate that it's currently possible.
It would be nice to support nested definitions of modules for repositories, I'm currently look at adding the libdefs for Ramda v0.23, the most recent version being v0.21. Obviously the changes between 2 minor versions aren't huge and a lot of stuff is reusable from v0.21. However, as it currently stands, it appears that I'd need to add a definitions/npm/ramda_v0.23.0 directory to sit alongside the existing definitons/npm/ramda_v0.21.x libdef.
I'm relatively new to
flow-typed
so I apologize if this functionality already exists and I just haven't been able to find it, although my initial playing around with it doesn't seem to indicate that it's currently possible.It would be nice to support nested definitions of modules for repositories, I'm currently look at adding the libdefs for Ramda v0.23, the most recent version being v0.21. Obviously the changes between 2 minor versions aren't huge and a lot of stuff is reusable from v0.21. However, as it currently stands, it appears that I'd need to add a
definitions/npm/ramda_v0.23.0
directory to sit alongside the existingdefinitons/npm/ramda_v0.21.x
libdef.It'd be nice to define a structure such as
Through this, sharing definitions between versions is not only easier but is encourages by the structure of definitions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: