Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Load Balancer doesn't use Zone Redundancy when you set the machines to Zone Redundancy #50

Closed
RAWRitsCloud opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@RAWRitsCloud
Copy link

Hey,

When you deploy any of the templates that support putting the Virtual Machines in Availability zones, the standard load balancer that is deployed with it is deployed into "No Zone" which kind of makes the whole purpose of Zonal redundancy pointless.

Could you add the Zones into the front-end configuration of the load balancers the same way you do for the Virtual machines.

@jvhoof
Copy link
Collaborator

jvhoof commented Dec 12, 2022

Hi,

Thank you for opening this issue. After reviewing this it seems that Microsoft has changed the behavior of their API. Before 2020-08-01 the default behavior was to create a zone redundant PIP. This is no longer the case.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-network/ip-services/create-public-ip-template

We have update the main templates in our test repo on the link below. These will now create zone redundant PIPs for the front-end configuration.

https://github.com/40net-cloud/fortinet-azure-solutions/tree/main/FortiGate

Let us know if this is indeed what you are referring to and we can push this change to our main repo.

Regards,

Joeri

@RAWRitsCloud
Copy link
Author

Hi Joeri

Yes that seems to work now!

Thank you
James

@jvhoof
Copy link
Collaborator

jvhoof commented Dec 27, 2022

Hi James,

Perfect. The templates on this repo are now also up to date.

Thank you for reporting this issue. Happy holidays,

Joeri

@jvhoof jvhoof closed this as completed Dec 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants