Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add taper angle feature in pad and pocket #5534

Closed
FreeCAD-Bug-Importer opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed

Add taper angle feature in pad and pocket #5534

FreeCAD-Bug-Importer opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@FreeCAD-Bug-Importer
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue imported from https://tracker.freecad.org/view.php?id=622

  • Reporter: electronlibre
  • Date submitted: 3/5/2012
  • FreeCAD version: 0.12
  • Category: Feature
  • Status: confirmed
  • Tags:

Original report text

It would be nice to have a taper angle option in pad and pocket tools (Part design workbench), similar to that on Extrude (Part WB).

Other bug information

  • Priority: normal
  • Severity: feature
  • Category: Feature
  • Updated: 2/6/2021

Discussion from Mantis ticket

Comment by Jriegel 2012-05-18 10:38

Patch applied to Assembly branch!

Works well!

To be done -> Use code in Pocket


Comment by helo10 2012-06-08 11:26

in progress


Comment by jrheinlaender 2013-01-13 14:32

V0.13 now has a PartDesign::Draft feature which allows to select faces and apply a draft angle to them.

This is not the same functionality as that requested, but will lead to the same result.

I am not sure whether we should put even more options into the Pad/Pocket features. When I modelled for customers from the German automative industry, they insisted on always having draft in a separate feature.


Comment by Jriegel 2013-01-13 14:39

Draft can be done Pocket/Pad for easy and simple cases. If you want to have more control Pad/Pocket get for sure overloaded.
I think both make sense. A one angle solution in the basic features and a own feature for the more sophisticated (future) solutions..

I have generally no problem if there are overlapping features functionality.
May the better win!

@chennes chennes closed this as completed Feb 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants