Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate running test_infra tests against production HW #4216

Closed
zenmonkeykstop opened this issue Mar 1, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5318
Closed

Investigate running test_infra tests against production HW #4216

zenmonkeykstop opened this issue Mar 1, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5318
Assignees

Comments

@zenmonkeykstop
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Currently, QA testing involves a "basic server testing" phase that duplicates some checks already present in the test_infra tests while missing a whole bunch of others. It would be useful to be able to automate this testing phase and do it in more detail using the test_infra suite. Failing that, a script that could be run from the Admin Workstation to do basic server testing would be a useful thing.

User Stories

As a SecureDrop Tester, I want to be able to automatically run basic server tests against production servers.

@eloquence
Copy link
Member

Tentatively adding to 1.4.0 milestone per today's sprint retrospective; please don't hesitate to nominate other issues on the QA automation front that should be higher priority or also added.

@redshiftzero redshiftzero moved this from Near Term - SecureDrop Core to Nominated for next sprint in SecureDrop Team Board May 19, 2020
@eloquence eloquence moved this from Nominated for next sprint to Sprint #51 - 5/20-6/3 in SecureDrop Team Board May 20, 2020
@eloquence eloquence removed this from Sprint #52 - 6/3-6/17 in SecureDrop Team Board Jun 17, 2020
@eloquence eloquence modified the milestones: 1.4.0, 1.5.0 Jun 22, 2020
@rmol rmol removed this from the 1.5.0 milestone Jul 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants