Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FACIT -- Generalize ICRH effects #87

Open
cjperks7 opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

FACIT -- Generalize ICRH effects #87

cjperks7 opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@cjperks7
Copy link
Collaborator

I can do this one too

Issue

The formula used in FACIT for the ICRH effects on poloidal asymmetry assumes just D(H) minority heating. Future fusion devices (SPARC) will use other schemes such as D(He3), D/T(He3).

Plan of action

In the original derivation by M. Reinke, they obtained a general expression and then specified it to D(H) which was grabbed for use it FACIT. Pretty straight forward to change that to account for other schemes.

@fsciortino
Copy link
Owner

Of interest for @DanielFajardoJ

@fsciortino fsciortino added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 28, 2023
@DanielFajardoJ
Copy link
Collaborator

This would be a good improvement for ICRH applications, thanks @cjperks7

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants