Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Testing > Launching Nodes #1915

Closed
arboleya opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Docs: Testing > Launching Nodes #1915

arboleya opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
docs Requests pertinent to documentation
Milestone

Comments

@arboleya
Copy link
Member

Describe all of its options and provide different examples covering multiple use cases.

  • Short-Lived Nodes? / Launching Nodes
    • Options
    • Examples

Consider documenting options like this, as it is superior to the auto-generated Typedocs.

@arboleya arboleya added the docs Requests pertinent to documentation label Mar 21, 2024
@arboleya arboleya mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2024
@arboleya arboleya added the p0 label Jun 9, 2024
@arboleya arboleya added this to the Mainnet milestone Jun 9, 2024
@arboleya arboleya removed the mainnet label Jun 9, 2024
@arboleya
Copy link
Member Author

@nedsalk Is this still a thing? Or has it been resolved in #1356?

@nedsalk
Copy link
Contributor

nedsalk commented Jun 20, 2024

@arboleya It's still a thing and right now I'm taking a look at slimming down launchNode in general post-#1356 and was planning on taking this issue. I'll assign it to myself now.

@nedsalk nedsalk self-assigned this Jun 20, 2024
@arboleya
Copy link
Member Author

No problem, but this issue is just about testing, correct?

Please try to keep the scope free from unrelated areas, if possible.

@nedsalk
Copy link
Contributor

nedsalk commented Jun 20, 2024

No problem, but this issue is just about testing, correct?

Oh, you're right! Then this issue as it is named is resolved. However, we still haven't documented the launchNode utility itself anywhere. Should we just rename this issue to Docs: Launching Nodes Programmatically? Would the p0 still remain?

@arboleya
Copy link
Member Author

Created a fresh issue here to reduce the noise:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Requests pertinent to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants