We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When I check using following command I get different number of vulnerabilities than what I get using VulsRepo?
docker run --rm -it -v ~/.ssh:/root/.ssh:ro -v $PWD:/vuls -v $PWD/vuls-log:/var/log/vuls -v /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro vuls/vuls report -format-short-text -config=./config.toml # path to config.toml in docker
so which one is giving correct results?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe Vulsrepo is wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This repository is being maintained. https://github.com/ishiDACo/vulsrepo
He is preparing a docker container now. please wait.
No branches or pull requests
When I check using following command I get different number of vulnerabilities than what I get using VulsRepo?
docker run --rm -it
-v ~/.ssh:/root/.ssh:ro
-v $PWD:/vuls
-v $PWD/vuls-log:/var/log/vuls
-v /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro
vuls/vuls report
-format-short-text
-config=./config.toml # path to config.toml in docker
so which one is giving correct results?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: