You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for your wonderful work! In your paper, RM model can improve the performance of MobileNetV2, but your work do not implement RM model on MobileNetV3. Why did you choose MobileNetV2 instead of MobileNetV3? MobileNetV3 is better than MobileNetV2. Moreover, I want to ask if I want to apply RM model to MobileNetV3, the implementation of RM in MobileNetV3 is similar to RM model in MobilNetV2? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
RM Operation can equivalent remove the residual connection from MobileNetV2.
Though better than MobileNetV2, there are SE blocks in MobileNetV3, which can't be removed by RM Operation.
One can design or search a plain MobileNet with SE module.
Hi, thanks for your wonderful work! In your paper, RM model can improve the performance of MobileNetV2, but your work do not implement RM model on MobileNetV3. Why did you choose MobileNetV2 instead of MobileNetV3? MobileNetV3 is better than MobileNetV2. Moreover, I want to ask if I want to apply RM model to MobileNetV3, the implementation of RM in MobileNetV3 is similar to RM model in MobilNetV2? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: