Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For MobileNetV3 #6

Closed
qdd1234 opened this issue Nov 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

For MobileNetV3 #6

qdd1234 opened this issue Nov 10, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@qdd1234
Copy link

qdd1234 commented Nov 10, 2021

Hi, thanks for your wonderful work! In your paper, RM model can improve the performance of MobileNetV2, but your work do not implement RM model on MobileNetV3. Why did you choose MobileNetV2 instead of MobileNetV3? MobileNetV3 is better than MobileNetV2. Moreover, I want to ask if I want to apply RM model to MobileNetV3, the implementation of RM in MobileNetV3 is similar to RM model in MobilNetV2? Thanks!

@fxmeng
Copy link
Owner

fxmeng commented Nov 10, 2021

RM Operation can equivalent remove the residual connection from MobileNetV2.
Though better than MobileNetV2, there are SE blocks in MobileNetV3, which can't be removed by RM Operation.
One can design or search a plain MobileNet with SE module.

@qdd1234 qdd1234 closed this as completed Nov 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants