Upconvolution layer at the end of Dilated10 ?

[paulineluc]

Hi there,

First of all, great work ! :)

I noticed there is an upconvolution layer at the end of Dilated10, (see here).

Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't remember seeing this mentioned in the paper. Is this the model which led to the results presented in the paper ? Or perhaps it is a new one ? If so, could you kindly advise on whether you kept the same training procedure ?
Thanks ! Cheers,

Pauline

[fyu]

yes, I added an upconv in training cityscapes models because the high resolution of cityscapes data, which is the one presented in the paper. It follows the same training procedure described in the paper.

[paulineluc]

Ok thanks !