Fetching contributors…
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
91 lines (72 sloc) 4.64 KB
# ______ ____ __ __ _____
# | __ | @ | \ | \ | || ___| (TM)
# | _____|.------. .-----. .-----. _ -. .-.------. | |\ || \| ||___ |
# | | | __ ||__ --'|__ --'| |\ Y /| _--__|_| |/ || || \_| |
# |__| |____|_||______||______||_| \_/ |_______/|____/ |__|\__||_____|
A tool to collect DNS records passively to aid Incident handling, Network
Security Monitoring (NSM) and general digital forensics.
PassiveDNS sniffs traffic from an interface or reads a pcap-file and outputs
the DNS-server answers to a log file. PassiveDNS can cache/aggregate duplicate
DNS answers in-memory, limiting the amount of data in the logfile without
losing the essense in the DNS answer.
Example output from version 1.0.0->Current in the log file (/var/log/passivedns.log):
#timestamp||dns-client ||dns-server||RR class||Query||Query Type||Answer||TTL||Count
PassiveDNS works on IPv4 and IPv6 traffic and parse DNS traffic over TCP and UDP.
** How can PassiveDNS be used: **
Typical usages:
1) Search for domain or IP history when working on an incident.
Company has malware talking to
At current time, the domain is resolving to say
You search your Flowdata and find the clients talking to that IP and
remidate. You look at the Flowdata, and you discover that the date
and time the clients first talked to that IP, and concludes that as
the time of infection...
But using PassiveDNS data, quering the domain, you get following history:
FirstSeen | LastSeen | TYPE | TTL | Query | Answer
2011-12-01 | 2011-12-11 | A | 60 | |
2011-12-11 | 2011-12-18 | A | 60 | |
2011-12-18 | 2012-01-14 | A | 60 | |
Going back and searching for in your Flowdata, you find
traffic back to the FirstSeen data, and you also see more clients
initially infected (so you did not manage to remidate/check out all your
clients in the first run by just looking at IP Doing
forensics on the the clients you missed in the first run, reveals that
they have downloaded a different malware and deleted the initial one,
that beeing the reason you did not see flows from them to
The new malware gives you new domains and IPs to go look for...
2) Say you have an indication of malicious C&C traffic going to an IP on
port 80. The domain used by the alleged malware is supposed to be Searching you Flowdata, reveals lots of clients
talking to that IP, and you might think that the whole company is p0wned.
A quick search in your PassiveDNS DB shows you that the IP in question is
also hosting 300 + websites and you might even spot a website hosted on
that IP that you are familiar with and that you know lots of people in the
company would legit visit daily.
Searching your PassiveDNS DB gives you no hits for the domain in question,
hopefully meaning that you dont have that malware talking to that domain
in your network.
3) You know that * are often used in malware and the
subdomains change randomly. Many have rules for such domains in their
IDS/IPS, sucking up unnecessary juice from the systems. Having a script
pre-loaded with a list of regexp of domains and subdomains to watch for
and giving you an alert when they hit will give you much better detection
on threat based on domains.
You can also do a whois for all new top domains seen, correlate the whois
info with a list of know bad info, such as the name of the person or
company that has registered the domain, telephone/fax numbers, address
and so on, ending up with a score that might be high enough for triggering
an alert to you :)
Questions, suggestions, sugar or flame is always welcome :)
I hope PassiveDNS gives you a new tool to fight malware and its herders...
(c)2011-2015 - Edward Bjarte Fjellskål