You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi everyone, do you know if is it possible to modify the y-axis range of the plot generated by the GAMj package?
As you can see, the y-range goes up to 0.2 even if the single point only goes up to less than 0.1. I think this is due to the fact that I am only plotting the 'random effects' and not the 'observed scores,' which do reach 0.2 (pic below). However, I only want plotting 'random effects' so I would like it to be limited to 0.1, as it would improve the graph's appearance.
Also, I would like to take this opportunity to ask why it might be interesting to plot the 'observed scores'? As far as I know, these would be the values of the model only taking into account the fixed factors and not the random ones. Still, since it is a mixed model, it will always be essential to consider these random variables. So, I do not see the sense of showing only the values of the fixed ones. But it's possible that I'm wrong and not understanding it correctly.
Thank you all in advance.
Regards,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi everyone, do you know if is it possible to modify the y-axis range of the plot generated by the GAMj package?
As you can see, the y-range goes up to 0.2 even if the single point only goes up to less than 0.1. I think this is due to the fact that I am only plotting the 'random effects' and not the 'observed scores,' which do reach 0.2 (pic below). However, I only want plotting 'random effects' so I would like it to be limited to 0.1, as it would improve the graph's appearance.
Also, I would like to take this opportunity to ask why it might be interesting to plot the 'observed scores'? As far as I know, these would be the values of the model only taking into account the fixed factors and not the random ones. Still, since it is a mixed model, it will always be essential to consider these random variables. So, I do not see the sense of showing only the values of the fixed ones. But it's possible that I'm wrong and not understanding it correctly.
Thank you all in advance.
Regards,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: