Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.0 Notes AKA ideas that require breaking changes #82

Open
gampleman opened this issue Apr 1, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

3.0 Notes AKA ideas that require breaking changes #82

gampleman opened this issue Apr 1, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@gampleman
Copy link
Owner

gampleman commented Apr 1, 2020

Note: None of this is going to happen any time soon. The last breaking change we made was forced by a new version of Elm. But it is a good idea to keep a wish list of things to change in the future.

  • sequential scale can easily support axes, but don't at the moment
  • Loosen type signature of invertExtent to support threshold scales.
  • Use partial application for scales to simplify type signatures.
  • Switch from record to list style for band/point configs.
  • Change architecture of Force to allow for nicer custom forces as well as better dead code elimination
  • Better version of Interpolation.list #144
  • Axis ticks color #65
  • Surely Shape.stack can be made more intuitive.

See also #10.

@gampleman gampleman pinned this issue Sep 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant