Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Flexible non-judgment value #36

Closed
Garrafao opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Flexible non-judgment value #36

Garrafao opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Garrafao
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right

Comments

@Garrafao
Copy link
Owner

Currently, the pipeline interprets judgments of 0.0 as non-valid. For label ranges including 0 as valid label, such as cosine similarity ranging from -1 to 1, this leads to wrongly treating 0.0 as non-valid label. Thus, we need to make the non-valid label a parameter.
@Garrafao Garrafao added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Oct 23, 2023
@Garrafao Garrafao self-assigned this Oct 23, 2023
@Garrafao
Copy link
Owner Author

This was solved with the last commit. The parameter 'nonvalue' specified in the input parameters file now controls this. E.g. here: https://github.com/Garrafao/WUGs/blob/main/scripts/parameters_system2.sh .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Garrafao Garrafao

Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Garrafao