Using blacklists in Recorder leads to 'ambiguous reference' in the generated script

[nremond]

When I use the blacklist in the recorder, the script wil contain the line:

.inferHtmlResources(black = BlackList(""".*\.css.*"""), white = WhiteList())

But the compiler in Eclipse (+ Scala IDE for Eclipse) complains:

ambiguous reference to overloaded definition, both method inferHtmlResources in class HttpProtocolBuilder of type (black: io.gatling.core.filter.BlackList, white: io.gatling.core.filter.WhiteList)io.gatling.http.config.HttpProtocolBuilder and method inferHtmlResources in class HttpProtocolBuilder of type (white: io.gatling.core.filter.WhiteList, black: io.gatling.core.filter.BlackList)io.gatling.http.config.HttpProtocolBuilder match argument types (black: io.gatling.core.filter.BlackList,white: io.gatling.core.filter.WhiteList)

When I leave the parameter names out of the method call, the compiler can resolve the correct overload by type:

.inferHtmlResources(BlackList(""".*\.css.*"""), WhiteList())

See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/gatling/c087ltWzdAM

[pdalpra]

Ah, a nice example where overloading and named parameters conflict with each other.
When parameters are "unnamed", it resolves to a call to either one of those overloaded versions of inferHtmlResources :

• inferHtmlResources(BlackList, WhiteList)
• inferHtmlResources(WhiteList, BlackList)

But here, since parameters are named, both overloaded versions are applicable, and the compiler can't decide which one to pick.
We'll drop the named parameters in the generated simulation.